The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Wittman V Personhuballah

The Gavel · 14-1504 · 578 U.S. 539

Wittman v. Personhuballah

Wittman v. Personhuballah

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
14-1504
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
May 23, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Mar 21, 2016

    71 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • Wittman v. Personhuballah

    May 23, 2016 · Breyer · 578 U.S. 539

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court

    Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. Ten Members of Congress from Virginia, intervenors in the District Court below, have appealed a judgment from a three-judge panel striking down a congressional redistricting plan applicable to the November 2016 election. We conclude that the intervenors now lack standing to pursue the appeal. And we consequently order the appeal dismi…

  • Wittman v. Personhuballah

    Feb 29, 2016 · 136 S. Ct. 1241

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Motion of the State appellees for divided argument and enlargement of time for oral argument granted and the time is divided as follows: 35 minutes for appellants, 10 minutes for State appellees, 15 minutes for private appellees, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.…

  • Wittman v. Personhuballah

    Feb 1, 2016 · 136 S. Ct. 998

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Application for stay presented to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to the Court denied.

  • Wittman v. Personhuballah

    Nov 13, 2015 · 136 S. Ct. 499

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether appellants lack standing because none reside in or represent the only congressional district whose constitutionality is at issue in this case.…

  • Wittman v. Personhuballah

    Sep 28, 2015 · 136 S. Ct. 25

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following question: Whether appellants have standing under Article III of the United States Constitution. Briefs, not to exceed 15 pages each, are to be filed simultaneously with Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before Tuesday, October 13, 2015. Reply briefs, not to exceed 10 pages each, are to the filed with Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before Tuesday, October 20, 201…