The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Rjr Nabisco Inc V European Community

The Gavel · 15-138 · 579 U.S. 325

RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community

RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
15-138
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
Jun 20, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Mar 21, 2016

    59 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community

    Jun 20, 2016 · 579 U.S. 325

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court

    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit…