The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Sep 23, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Pricing
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. Accounts optional. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Ledure V Union Pacific Railroad Co

The Gavel · 20-807 · 596 U.S. 242

LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionDownload PDFSCOTUS docket
Docket
20-807
Term
OT 2021
Status
Decided
Decided
Apr 28, 2022

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2021.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Mar 28, 2022

    101 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Opinion clusters from the case record, with links out when you want the publisher page. Full archived text follows below.

  • LeDure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

    Apr 28, 2022 · Per Curiam · 596 U.S. 242

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court

Archived opinion text

From the case record · courtlistener:html_with_citations · Select text to annotateDownload PDF

Opinion of the Court

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022) 1

 Per Curiam

 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
 preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
 notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-
 ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that
 corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 _________________

 No. 20–807
 _________________

 BRADLEY LEDURE, PETITIONER v. UNION PACIFIC
 RAILROAD COMPANY
 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
 APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 [April 28, 2022]

 PER CURIAM.
 The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

 JUSTICE BARRETT took no part in the consideration or de-
cision of this case.

Margin notes

Select text in an opinion to add a private margin note.