The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Husky Int L Electronics Inc V Ritz

The Gavel · 15-145 · 578 U.S. 355

Husky Int'l Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz

Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
15-145
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
May 16, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

  • Lead Opinion

    Author not listed

  • Dissent

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Mar 1, 2016

    54 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz

    May 16, 2016 · Ginsburg, Kennedy, Roberts, Sotomayor, Thomas · 578 U.S. 355

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court
    • Lead Opinion
    • Dissent

    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit…

  • Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz

    Feb 18, 2016 · 136 S. Ct. 1001

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

  • Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz

    Nov 6, 2015 · 136 S. Ct. 445

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.