The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Halo Electronics Inc V Pulse Electronics Inc

The Gavel · 14-1513 · 579 U.S. 93

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
14-1513
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
Jun 13, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Feb 23, 2016

    60 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

    Jun 13, 2016 · Roberts · 579 U.S. 93

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court

    Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 284 of the Patent Act provides that, in a case of infringement, courts "may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed." 35 U.S.C. § 284 . In In re Seagate…

  • Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.

    Jan 25, 2016 · 136 S. Ct. 993

    Read on CourtListener
    • Lead Opinion

    Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Joint motion of respondent for divided argument denied.…

  • Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.

    Oct 19, 2015 · 136 S. Ct. 356

    Read on CourtListener
    • Opinion of the Court
    • Lead Opinion

    No opinion found. Click here to view source material.