The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Foster V Chatman

The Gavel · 14-8349 · 578 U.S. 488

Foster v. Chatman

Foster v. Chatman

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
14-8349
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
May 23, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Lead Opinion

    Author not listed

  • Dissent

    Author not listed

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • Foster v. Chatman

    May 23, 2016 · Roberts, Thomas · 578 U.S. 488

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Lead Opinion
    • Dissent
    • Opinion of the Court

    Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner Timothy Foster was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death in a Georgia court. During jury selection at his trial, the State exercised peremptory strikes against all four black prospective jurors qualified to serve. Foster argued that the State's use of those strikes was racially motivated, in violation of our decision in Batson v. Kentucky,…