The LedgerPublic Record
BooksThe BooksFloorThe FloorGavelThe GavelDeskThe DeskRaceThe Race
DocketOpinionsArgumentsJustices
The LedgerPublic Record

Five shelves of federal record. Pick a shelf, then dig in.

Archives refreshed Aug 7, 2026

The Books

  • Overview
  • Rankings
  • Map
  • Historical
  • Awards
  • Composition

The Floor

  • Overview
  • Watchlist
  • Pipeline
  • Votes
  • Members

The Gavel

  • Overview
  • Docket
  • Opinions
  • Justices

The Desk

  • Overview
  • Presidencies
  • Actions

The Race

  • Overview
  • Map
  • Presidency
  • Senate
  • House

Guides

  • Overview
  • Start here
  • Students
  • Reporters
  • Tools

Reference

  • Home
  • Definitions
  • Methodology
  • Data integrity
  • Status
  • Data cache
  • Data dictionary
  • Usage
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • For AI agents

Free and open. No accounts. Privacy covers anonymous visit data only. Usage covers how to cite and reuse the archives. Contact uses a private form.

  1. Home
  2. ›The Gavel
  3. ›Docket
  4. ›Betterman V Montana

The Gavel · 14-1457 · 578 U.S. 437

Betterman v. Montana

Betterman v. Montana

DocketOpinionsCourtListener opinionSCOTUS docket
Docket
14-1457
Term
OT 2015
Status
Decided
Decided
May 19, 2016

Why tracked

Ledger editorial note, not an official Court ranking of importance.

SCOTUS merits case argued in OT 2015.

Lineup

  • Opinion of the Court

    Author not listed

Arguments

  • Mar 28, 2016

    57 min

    Official MP3CourtListener

Opinions

All opinions

Full opinion text is not archived here yet. Open CourtListener or the PDF when available; snippets below come from the case record.

  • Betterman v. Montana

    May 19, 2016 · 578 U.S. 437

    Read on CourtListenerOpinion PDF
    • Opinion of the Court

    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit…